翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ South-Western City School District (Franklin County, Ohio)
・ South-Western Iberian Bronze
・ South-Western Region, Venezuela
・ South-western Sydney
・ South32
・ Southadka
・ Southall
・ Southall (novel)
・ Southall (surname)
・ Southall (UK Parliament constituency)
・ Southall Black Sisters
・ Southall Drugs
・ Southall East Junction
・ Southall F.C.
・ Southall Gas Works
Southall rail crash
・ Southall Railway Centre
・ Southall railway station
・ Southall Studios
・ Southall Travel
・ Southam
・ Southam (disambiguation)
・ Southam and Long Itchington railway station
・ Southam Building
・ Southam College
・ Southam Road and Harbury railway station
・ Southam Rural District
・ Southam United F.C.
・ Southam's Cardall Collection
・ Southam, Gloucestershire


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Southall rail crash : ウィキペディア英語版
Southall rail crash

The Southall rail crash was an accident on the British railway system that occurred on 19 September 1997, on the Great Western Main Line at Southall, west London, in which an InterCity 125 (also called a High Speed Train) failed to stop at a red (danger) signal and collided with a freight train crossing its path. The incident resulted in 7 deaths and 139 injuries. Great Western Trains were fined £1.5 million for violations of health and safety law in connection with the accident.
==Incident==
The crash occurred after the 10:32 Great Western Trains HST passenger train from Swansea to London Paddington, worked by power cars 43173 + 43163 and operating with a defective Automatic Warning System (AWS), passed a red (danger) signal (SPAD), preceded by two cautionary signals.
As the tracks straightened ahead of the HST train, the driver observed a Class 59 locomotive a mile in distance, moving "at a funny angle" and realised to his horror that it was crossing the Up Main line. The EWS-operated freight train was coming from London on the Down Relief line, hauling twenty empty bogie hopper wagons, and permitted to cross Southall East Junction on its way into Southall Yard, south of the main lines. A collision was now inevitable. The HST was travelling at , and could not stop in time even under full braking.
Alan Bricker, the driver of the freight locomotive No. 59101, observed the approaching HST and expected it to stop, but was alarmed at its speed and apparent brake application. In desperation, he tried to accelerate his train out of the path of the HST, but to no avail. The later accident report found that:
#13:20 GMT, the front power car of the HST impacted with a hopper car
#2 seconds later, coach H impacts with a hopper. The HST power car severs the brake pipes of the freight train, causing the stranded rear hopper wagons to come to an immediate halt.
#4 seconds into the accident, with the HST still travelling at , coach H impacts with a severed coupling from the freight train, and begins to topple away from the freight train onto to its left side. It slid on its side for a further 4 seconds. 2 people died in this carriage.
#8 seconds into the accident, with both the forward HST power car and coach H clear forward of the scene, coach G - the second coach in the HST formation - hits the now stationary rear of the freight train. The freight wagons were resultantly driven back and jacknife.
#Both coach G and the impacted hopper wagon resultantly lifted into the air. Whilst the hopper wagon was restrained in its movement, colliding and jamming up against the nearby OLE stanchions, coach G slid under the hopper. This resultantly flattened the front of coach G.
#10 seconds into the accident, the residual rear of the HST train led by coach F, impacted with the now stationary coach G. The resultant energy release of the still in-motion rear of the HST bent the structure of coach G into a distinct half-curve at its mid point. As a result of its various actions, and almost complete destruction, 5 people died in coach G.
#The rear of the HST, led by coach F, impact with the stationary rear of the freight train. coach F is left derailed.
Six people were killed, and a seventh passenger died in hospital. 〔http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/HSE_Southall1997.pdf〕
If the AWS equipment on the High Speed Train (HST) passenger train had been working, the chance of the accident occurring would have been highly unlikely, though not completely eliminated, since the AWS is only an advisory system. The driver's attention had been distracted (though no proof was ever discovered) and he did not observe the preceding signals visually, but AWS would have given him a clear audible warning, which would have required him to acknowledge the warning. Failure to acknowledge the warning would have caused the train's brakes to be applied. Automatic Train Protection (ATP) equipment would have almost certainly prevented the accident. The train was fitted with ATP but this was switched off. At the time of the accident, the ATP equipment was not required to be switched on, as it had proved troublesome in service. In addition, not all drivers had been trained on it.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Southall rail crash」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.